Do covers need a license for brand videos?

Written by Jason Lee, Co-Founder · Reviewed by Hani Sedyono, Head of Operations & Legal · Reviewed October 18, 2026

Short answer

Yes, in almost every case. A cover avoids the record label’s recording, but it still uses the song itself: the melody and the lyrics. The song is owned by music publishers. Putting it in a brand video, sponsored post or ad needs their permission, usually called a sync license. The “compulsory” license people mention for covers only covers audio releases, not video.

Every hit song has two owners

This is the part most marketers have never been told. A hit song is two separate copyrights stacked on top of each other.

The first is the composition: the melody, the chords, the lyrics. The songwriters own it, and it’s usually managed by music publishers such as Sony Music Publishing, Universal Music Publishing or Warner Chappell. The second is the sound recording: the actual audio file of that artist singing it in a studio. The record label usually owns that.

When a brand uses the original track, it needs permission from both. When a creator records a cover, they’ve made a new recording, so the label’s copyright drops out. The publisher’s copyright doesn’t. The song is still the song.

Diagram: a hit song has two copyrights. The composition is owned by publishers, the recording by the label. A cover still uses the composition. One hit song = two copyrights The song (composition) Melody + lyrics Owner: songwriters / publishers License: sync license The recording (master) The actual audio file Owner: record label License: master use license Original track in your ad Needs BOTH licenses A cover in your ad Still needs the sync license
A cover removes the label’s recording from the picture. The publisher’s rights in the song stay.

The “compulsory license” trap

If you’ve looked into covers before, you may have read that anyone can record a cover without asking. That’s partly true, and it’s where people get caught.

In the US, once a song has been released, the law lets anyone make and distribute their own audio recording of it, as long as they pay the set mechanical royalty. This is the compulsory mechanical license. It’s why bands can release cover albums on streaming services without negotiating with every songwriter.

But that license covers audio recordings. It doesn’t cover putting the song in a video, and it certainly doesn’t cover using it to sell something. Pairing music with moving pictures is called synchronization, and there’s no compulsory license for it. The publisher can say yes, say no, or name a price. For a well-known song in an ad, the price can be high, and some songwriters simply refuse to let their songs sell products.

Short version: a mechanical license lets you sell a cover on Spotify. It doesn’t let your brand put that cover in a TikTok ad.

What counts as using the song

People are often surprised by how little it takes. These all use the composition:

Parody is worth a quick word. Some parody can be fair use in the US when it comments on the original song. A jingle that borrows a famous tune to sell sneakers usually isn’t commenting on anything. Courts have been skeptical of that kind of use, so treat it as risky.

Humming a few notes in the background of a vlog is a gray area. Building your product video around a recognizable chorus isn’t.

Illustration: a creator singing into a microphone on a phone screen with a Paid partnership label; a callout says the song still belongs to the publisher. Paid partnership ♪ cover – @creator What the creator owns ✓ Their voice and this recording What they don’t own ✗ The melody and lyrics ✗ The right to use them in an ad Those belong to the song’s publishers.
A great cover is still someone else’s song. The creator can’t license what they don’t own.

A typical way this goes wrong

A skincare brand books ten creators for a launch. One of them has a lovely voice and does a slowed-down acoustic cover of a current chart song while applying the serum. It’s the best performing video in the batch, so the team runs it as a Spark Ad for six weeks.

Nobody thinks about music because there’s no track. TikTok doesn’t mute it, because it isn’t the label’s recording. Then a publisher’s monitoring team spots it, and the brand gets a letter about the song. The creator’s contract says nothing about music, so the brand can’t easily push the cost back to them. The fix that would have cost nothing on day one (an original jingle, or a library track) now comes with a negotiation.

Publishers do enforce, not just labels

Most headlines are about record labels suing brands. Publishers enforce too. In 2023, members of the US National Music Publishers’ Association sued X (formerly Twitter) over roughly 1,700 songs. That case was about the platform, not a brand, and it was reported settled in 2026. It still shows how seriously publishers track where their songs appear. Several of the label suits against brands, including the case against Quince, also include publisher claims over the songs themselves, alongside the recordings.

In the US, the law sets statutory damages for each work infringed: from $750 to $30,000, and up to $150,000 if the use is found willful. A cover still counts as using the work. You can see recent brand cases in our lawsuit tracker.

What brands can do instead

Safe

Original music you commissioned and own, with a written agreement saying so. TikTok’s Commercial Music Library. Stock music licensed for social and paid ads.

Possible, with work

A real sync license from every publisher who owns a share of the song. Hits often have several writers and several publishers, so expect weeks, not days.

Avoid

Creator covers of hits in sponsored posts. Karaoke tracks. Lyric overlays. “Inspired by” jingles that copy a melody.

What to put in creator briefs

The cheapest fix is a sentence in the brief. Tell creators, in plain words, that sponsored content can’t include covers, singing, humming or lyrics of songs they didn’t write. Ask them to use library music or their own original audio. Then add it to the contract so it’s more than a request. Our creator content license template includes music wording you can copy.

If you work with an agency or an affiliate program, the same rule should apply to every video that promotes your product. You’re the one who benefits from the post, so you’re the one a publisher is most likely to come after.

How we check covers

Song recognition tools are good at matching original recordings and weaker on covers, because the audio is different. Our reviewers listen for the song, not just the file. When we find a cover of a commercial song in a brand or creator post, we mark it red (fix now) if it’s running as an ad, and yellow (fix soon) if it’s an older organic post. Every flag comes with a specific fix.

Common questions

Can a creator cover a song in a sponsored post if they credit the artist?

Credit isn’t permission. The song’s publishers still need to license it for use in the video.

Doesn’t a mechanical license cover covers?

In the US it covers audio recordings of a song, like a cover released on streaming. It doesn’t cover pairing the song with video or using it in an ad. That needs a sync license from the publishers.

What if the cover is only a few seconds long?

There’s no safe length. A recognizable chorus or hook can be enough to count as using the song.

Is a piano or instrumental version safer?

No. The melody is part of the composition, so an instrumental version still uses the song even with no lyrics.

Who pays if a creator’s cover gets my brand sued?

Usually the brand is the main target because it benefits from the post. Whether you can recover costs from the creator depends on your contract, so add music warranties to it.

Part of: Music licensing for brands

Related guides

General information, not legal advice. Platform rules and licenses change; check the current terms or ask your lawyer about your situation. Lawsuit figures are as reported and represent claims, not findings, unless noted.